Mujahedin Khalq ‘s Function

Why does the Iran Policy Committee employ a former CIA employee?

Why does the Iran Policy Committee employ a former CIA employee, former military officers, and Professor Raymond Tanter? Professor Sheldon Foote: Why does the Iran Policy Committee employ a former CIA employee, former military officers, and Professor Raymond Tanter?

Traitors USA, May 27, 2007

From: Paul Sheldon Foote [mailto:pfoote@cox.net]

Sent: Saturday, May 26, 2007 1:09 PM

To: Greg Jaffe (greg.jaffe@wsj.com)

Cc: Traitors USA (traitorsusa@yahoogroups.com); Andrew Bacevich (bacevich@bu.edu)

Subject: FW: WSJ.com – Historian Reflects On War and Valor And a Son’s Death

Historian Reflects

On War and Valor

And a Son’s Death

Andrew Bacevich Opposed

Iraq Conflict but, in Grief,

He Still Believes in Serving

By GREG JAFFE

May 26, 2007; Page A1, The Wall Street Journal

As a historian and former soldier, he takes clear-cut lessons from the check, his son’s death and the broader war. "When you use force, the unintended consequences that result are so large and the surprises so enormous that it really reaffirms the ancient wisdom to which we once adhered — namely, to see force as something to be used only as a last resort." In the future, he says, historians will wonder how a country such as the U.S. ever came to see military force as "such a flexible, efficient, cost-effective and supposedly useful instrument."

For a father, the lessons are far less clear-cut. When he was writing against the war, which was often, he told himself he was doing the best he could to end the conflict.

Should he have told his son not to volunteer for such a war? "I believe in service to country. I believe soldiering is an honorable profession. There is no clear right and wrong here," he says. "What I tried to do was inadequate."

Write to Greg Jaffe at greg.jaffe@wsj.com1

———————-

Greg,

As a Vietnam War veteran and volunteer myself and an opponent of the Iraq War, my view is that there is very clear right and wrong with the Iraq War.

In September 2002, President George W. Bush spoke at the United Nations against Saddam Hussein. The White House distributed a background paper listing three Saddam Hussein-supported terrorist organizations as pretexts for going to war with Iraq. One of the three terrorist organizations is the Iranian Communist MEK (MKO, PMOI, Rajavi Cult, or Pol Pot of Iran). The MEK has murdered large numbers of Iranian and Iraqi civilians, American military officers, and Rockwell International employees. The MEK has been on the State Department’s list of terrorist organizations since the administration of former President Bill Clinton.

In 2003, American and coalition forces attacked Camp Ashraf, Iraq, killing some of the MEK. Since then, American and Bulgarian forces have been protecting America’s Marxist enemies. Some posted reports and comments on the Fox News Channel have suggested that the American government is using the MEK for terrorist activities inside Iran today. The Wall Street Journal has promoted the views of MEK leaders and of their neoconservative (neo-Trotskyite) supporters.

Hundreds of members of Congress (Democrats and Republicans) have signed statements of support for the MEK. Many members of Congress have accepted campaign contributions from MEK supporters.

After former Secretary of State Colin Powell insisted upon the closing of the office of the MEK’s National Council of Resistance of Iran (NCRI) in the National Press Building in Washington, DC, the Fox News Channel retained Alireza Jafarzadeh as a foreign affairs analyst.

The Iran Policy Committee supports the Iranian Communist MEK:

Are there any honest American historians or journalists exposing the funding and activities of the Iran Policy Committee? Why does the Iran Policy Committee employ a former CIA employee, former military officers, and Professor Raymond Tanter?

http://rightweb.irc-online.org/profile/3280

For years, many writers at many Web sites have been exposing the MEK. To name only a few examples (my apologies to the many other fine writers not listed):

Justin Raimondo, Antiwar.com

http://www.antiwar.com/justin/

Carol Moore, several Web sites

http://www.carolmoore.net/photos/dcpeaceprotests2004.html

Anne Singleton, Iran-Interlink

http://www.iran-interlink.org/

Soraya Ulrich, many articles posted at many Web sites

Barry O’Connell, blogs and Web sites

Instead of relying upon the Fox News Channel and other major American television media, The Wall Street Journal and other major American newspapers, or evening comedy shows, the most casual researchers on the Internet can discover easily the truth about why the neoconservatives (neo-Trotskyites) want endless wars.

While I am a professor myself, one does not need to be a professor who knows that if you read only sources supporting your prior beliefs that you will make major research blunders.

The following books are examples of books even the most casual researcher should have found:

Tragedy & Hope: A History of the World in Our Time (Hardcover)

by Carroll Quigley

Former President Bill Clinton took a course with Professor Quigley. I leave it to readers to discover how little or how much history Clinton learned from the course.

A similar, shorter book is:

The Shadows of Power: The Council on Foreign Relations and the American Decline

by James Perloff

America the Virtuous: The Crisis of Democracy and the Quest for Empire

by Claes Ryn

Professor Ryn exposed the lies of the neoconservatives about exporting democracy.

None Dare Call It Treason – 25 Years Later

by John A. Stormer

Wall Street and the Bolshevik Revolution

by Anthony Cyril Sutton

Wall Street and the Rise of Hitler

by Anthony Cyril Sutton

As a Vietnam War veteran who volunteered to serve in Vietnam, I learned from history that many of America’s worst enemies are Americans. No American who has done any reasonable research would volunteer to serve in Iraq today in order to enrich and to empower the chickenhawk neoconservatives (neo-Trotskyites) who admire Trotsky and Machiavelli and who have rejected traditional American values. Neoconservatives (neo-Trotskyites) support totalitarian takeovers in Iran and elsewhere.

Anyone who is considering joining the military today should do some research about Colorado Republican Congressman Tom Tancredo, who is a 2008 candidate for President. Tancredo avoided service in the Vietnam War using a mental excuse. Tancredo is a neoconservative who supports the Iranian Communist MEK. Where are the condemnations of Tancredo by the major American media for being a traitor worse than Benedict Arnold, a hero of the American Revolution before betraying the American Revolution? See:

Crazy for You

By Patricia Calhoun

Published: December 3, 1998

http://www.westword.com/1998-12-03/news/crazy-for-you/

Then, they should research why some in the American media have been attempting to exclude Texas Republican Congressman Ron Paul from the debates and from being mentioned in the media. They can start by reading Congressman Ron Paul’s July 10, 2003 speech in Congress:

HON. RON PAUL OF TEXAS

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

July 10, 2003

Neo – CONNED

http://www.house.gov/paul/congrec/congrec2003/cr071003.htm

Some Americans have not been conned by the neo-conservatives (neo-Trotskyites).

There are a large number of Web sites listing the chickenhawks, such as:

http://www.sourcewatch.org/index.php?title=Chicken-hawk

Why should any American die or become disabled to serve the corrupt interests of America’s neo-conservative (neo-Trotskyite) chickenhawks?

I served in Vietnam. No American should serve in Iraq today.

Readers might learn something from posted quotations about history, such as:

George Bernard Shaw:

We learn from history that we learn nothing from history.

George Santayana:

Those who cannot learn from history are doomed to repeat it.

http://www.wisdomquotes.com/cat_history.html

May 31, 2007 1 comment

Mujahedin Khalq 's Function

Mujahedin Treachery

Meeting between Abbas Davari; Head of the MKO Central Committee and officials from Saddam Hussein’s Secret Intelligence Service (IIS, Mukhaberat).

During the Iran-Iraq conflict of 1980-1988, the MKO would spy on the Iranian army and deliver their information to the Iraqis, in exchange of funds and military equipments.

These films were part of a long established policy of the Iraqi intelligence service, where they would secretly tape every meeting for future”insurance”. After the fall of Saddam Hussein the tapes got out to the public.

This shot clip is only a small segment of films currently available.

Download Mujahedin Treachery

May 30, 2007 0 comments

Mujahedin Khalq 's Function

MEK Fearful of Occupiers’ Exit from Iraq

What the terrorist MKO and its sympathizers call "US and European’s recognition of the right of people and opposition to change the regime in Iran"- apart from being a strategy or a tactic- is a formula that explains how the group is dependent on US policies.

This formula is already exposed since all unilateral policies of the US across the world- its aggression, occupation of Iraq and the continuation of its threats against Iran- are confirmed according to this formula and the MKO expresses concern about changes in it.

For instance, they see disadvantages for the group in US-Iran talks, therefore they warn the occupiers as follows:

"Iranian leaders believe that peace and stability can be achieved in Iraq through current process and with current government. If the US agrees, it would accept the outcome of "win-lose" and consequently Iran’s hegemony in Iraq. If the US disagrees, it will go deeper down in the quagmire of Iraq." (1)

The failure is so explicit that the gang of Rajavi resorts to stupid theories in order to hide the failure and its dependence on US policies.

Theories offered by Rajavi’s gang are rather funny:

"The truth is that the Iranian regime continues its policy of exporting crisis and fundamentalism in response to its internal crises and the public hatred towards the regime. If Iran agreed to cooperate with the world community and quit the policy of establishing Islamic empire, it would be deprived of foreign opportunities for survival because of internal threat, which is the hatred of people towards regime." (2)

This view, although a repetition of Rajavi’s stupid claims on Iraq’s war against Iran! (3), is a naïve projection resulted by irresolvable crises the MKO encounters, either in Iraq or Europe.

For example:

"Following the comments of Iraqi Government Spokesman Mr. Dabbagh on the expulsion of MKO from Iraq, official spokesperson for US embassy in Baghdad announced that US won’t change its policies on the MKO and there’s no reason for expelling the group." (4)

This is all for two reasons:

First, forces have become disappointed due to wholly wrong predictions of MKO leaders.

Second, in order to fool the MKO members, Rajavi and his traitor gang try to hid the group’s dependence on Neocons’ policies and its deals with Zionst lobbies in the US and are still shouting so-called revolutionary slogans!

—————————————————————–

1. Mehdi Same, Shaking hands with Satan and Dancing with Wolf

2. ibid

3. Hadi Jahednia, Decorating Terror and Terrorism

4. Website of MKO

Irandidban – 2007/5/24

May 28, 2007 0 comments

Mujahedin Khalq 's Function

Desperation Prevails in Rajavi’s Cult

According to incoming reports, the gang of Rajavi and its leaders in Paris are facing a new major challenge.

The fact is that the stupid remnants of Rajavi had promised their desperate members, tired of relying on foreign powers, that they "would push the US to clash Iran in Iraq" and that "a new resolution would be passed against Iran" that will worsen Iran’s situation in the international scene.

However, since the previous resolutions have proved to be futile and with Iran-US’s scheduled talks, desperate members in political section of the group have cautioned that measures of Rajavi cult are useless. They are no more obeying, which is essential for the cult to control its members.

This wave started first among sympathizers and supporters of MKO in France and UK after Maliki’s government was elected in Iraq despite all MKO propaganda.

At that time, remnants of Rajavi promised their members that American’s wouldn’t allow Shiites to come to power but this, and all other, promises of the group came up to be false.

Following this, Mehdi Abrishamchi was appointed to control members in political section but his harsh behavior has worsened the situation.

However, in lower levels, they’re still promising the members that a new resolution on Thursday would be a blow for Iran; this has enraged disappointed members.

The atmosphere of desperation and disappointment prevails in Camp Ashraf and even commanders despite all slogans by MKO leaders.

In this situation, along with the efforts of Rajavi’s gang to survive, all the energy of the group has been allocated to this recent crisis and it has been ordered (by Rajavi) that it shouldn’t get to the media; commander in Camp Ashraf have been tasked with ending the process of defections.

Irandidban, May 22, 2007

May 24, 2007 0 comments

Mujahedin Khalq 's Function

MKO Becomes Orphan Again

After losing its godfather (Saddam) in Iraq, the terrorist gang of Rajavi is now mourning for losing American generals, who were supposed to calm the loss of Saddam.

According to most of Iraqi media, a key issue in Iran-US upcoming talks for stabilizing Iraq is that the US should quit support for terrorist MKO. Even MKO supporter Saleh Mutlaq said in an interview with Japan’s Xinhua news agency that he’s seriously concerned about US’s intentions to stop supporting MKO.

Iraqi newspaper of Al-Sabah quoted Iraqi sources saying: "A radical Iranian opposition group will be one of the key discussion issues during talks between Iranian and U.S. officials in Iraq on May 28, an Iraqi newspaper reported Saturday.

The U.S. military presence in the Persian Gulf region and the withdrawal of American troops from Iraq are other issues that would be discussed.

The sources added that Iraqi officials propose the talks be focused only on the issue of Iraq.

Irandidban – 2007/05/21

May 24, 2007 0 comments

Mujahedin Khalq 's Function

MKO Admits Iran’s Nuclear Achievements

After Iran announced that it had achieved industrial level of uranium enrichment despite all pressures and sanctions, elements of Rajavi’s gang tried to deny the facts and they suddenly stopped their so-called revelations on Iran’s nuclear program.

At that time, Irandidban said that the MKO has been stripped of its ability to maneuver on Iran’s nuclear program and that they have become silent fearing that Iranian nuclear project may be taken into account seriously.

It seems that MKO leaders have forgotten their previous gestures (denying Iran’s advances) and believe that they should exaggerate Iran’s achievements to get to their goals.

MKO, which earlier denied Iran’s ability to have even the nuclear technology, has been forced now to admit the realities they don’t like.

MKO leaders have always been criticized for mixing their so-called political analyses with their dreams and feeding them to their restricted forces.

This is an undeniable characteristic of MKO leaders, and Rajavi himself in particular, but this is not the whole deviation by the gang of Rajavi. The fact is that he is a liar who deals with realities with censorship and sarcasm.

That is why the MKO has lagged behind in political issues.

Denying the facts of Iran’s advances and its political, social and scientific achievements is part of this illness, which results in censorship and restricting the members in Camp Ashraf.

Irandidban – 2007/05/19

May 21, 2007 0 comments

Mujahedin Khalq 's Function

Total may have helped finance terrorist group

According to Italian investigators, Total in 2002 unwittingly helped Baghdad finance an Iranian group, the Mujahidin Khalq, or People’s Mujahidin, which is on the U.S. government’s list of terrorist organizations. Less than a year later, in 2003, France’s counterintelligence agency stormed the group’s headquarters in Paris on terrorism charges. Besides collecting illegal funds through the surcharges, Baghdad also helped friends and allies around the world by awarding them oil contracts. A multinational committee led by the former U.S. Federal Reserve chairman, Paul Volcker, found that with this arrangement, Saddam was able to finance journalists, politicians and diplomats who he apparently believed would support his effort to lift the UN sanctions.

Seven oil contracts were also awarded to an Iranian exile organization, the Mujahidin Khalq, fiercely opposed to the government in Tehran, which was hostile to Saddam.

In 1992 the Mujahidin was blamed by the U.S. State Department for the almost simultaneous attacks on Iranian facilities in 13 European countries.

Investigators in the United States have a copy of a 1999 Iraqi memo summarizing an exchange between Iraqi intelligence and Iraq’s Oil Ministry regarding a request for oil received from the Mujahidin. The Iranian group had asked for the oil as a gift but, because of UN sanctions, the ministry could not comply.

The ministry was, however, willing to give the group a contract for two million barrels. The intelligence director had then provided the ministry the name of a company that the Mujahidin wanted to use as a front – Century Marketing Associates.

Contract M/11/44, which awarded more than five million barrels of oil to Century Marketing on Dec. 23, 2001, was signed by Haftavaradan Reza as a director of that company. Better known with his pseudonym of Saeed Mali, or Saeed Finance, Reza was at the time the No. 2 person in the finance department of the Mujahidin Khalq, according to Massoud Khodabandeh, a former executive committee member of the group.

At least some of that oil was bought by Betoil, a company controlled by an Italian trader, Fabrizio Loioli. An internal Betoil accounting document found by the Italian Guardia di Finanza indicates that 1,041,970 barrels of that contract was loaded onto the tanker Yannis P and sold to Total.

According to Loioli’s records, he received $156,295 in premium payments from Total for that shipment. "It was out of that money that Loioli would have paid the fee to the contract holder, that is Century Marketing," an Italian investigator said.

Almost a year later, in June 2003, the French riot police stormed the suburban Paris headquarters of the People’s Mujahidin. The investigation is still open.

Total declined to comment on the case.

Claudio Gatti

International Herald Tribune

The New York Times Media Group

17 May 2007

May 21, 2007 0 comments

Mujahedin Khalq 's Function

Iranian Resistance Group Challenges EU Terror Listing

National Council of Resistance of Iran spokesman Farzin Hashemi at a hotel in Brussels, 10 May 2007

An Iranian resistance group has gone to court to force the European Union to remove the organization from a terror blacklist and pay it $1.4 million in damages.

At a news conference Thursday in Brussels, lawyers representing the People’s Mujahadeen Organization of Iran complained that the EU continued to list the group as a terrorist organization, despite a court ruling annulling that designation.

The European Court of First Instance decided last December to annul the listing. But the EU has argued that the decision was based on procedural matters and refers only to an older list, not the current one. The EU says it has sent the People’s Mujahadeen a letter explaining why it is blacklisted.

The group’s political arm (the National Council of Resistance of Iran) claims the EU has taken the decision in order to appease the Iranian government.

Iran protested last week’s visit by one of the group’s leaders, Maryam Rajavi, to the European Parliament.

The organization began in the 1960s as a leftist-Islamist militant group challenging the rule of Shah Mohammad Reza Pahlavi, but split with the ruling Shi’ite clerics, including Ayatollah Khomenei, after the Shah was overthrown. The organization established bases in Iraq during the Iran-Iraq War.

The group claims to have given up its militancy in 2001, but the United States continues to consider it a terrorist organization as well.

Some information for this report was provided by AFP, AP and Reuters.

By VOA News – 10 May 2007

May 14, 2007 0 comments

Mujahedin Khalq 's Function

Planned MKO violence linked to damning US Terror Report

A series of irreversible setbacks in recent months has apparently sealed the fate of the Mojahedin-e Khalq’s (MKO, aka Rajavi cult) in political circles.

On December 12, 2006 Judgement of the Court of First Instance of the European Court of Justice in case T-228/02 was announced. By pouring money into top legal teams, the MKO had been convinced of a favourable outcome. But British Foreign Minister Margaret Beckett clarified the European position; new legislation has ensured that all the MKO’s assets remained frozen and its proscription as a terrorist entity remained unchanged. The Court did, however, rule that the EC give the reasons for its proscription to the MKO.

The MKO reaction to this setback was to pretend it wasn’t true and to disseminate its own version of the Court ruling. Rajavi sent two MEPs to Camp Ashraf in Iraq to celebrate with the captive combatants ‘the removal of the MKO from the terrorist list’. Rajavi told his followers they would soon be re-armed to resume training in earnest to pursue their twenty-five year quest to overthrow the Iranian regime in its entirety through the National Liberation Army (the front name used for Mojahedin military activity).

The MKO also had its members in Europe, North America and Australia set up any publicity stunt possible, from pickets to petitions to say the Court must abide by its own ruling and remove the MKO from the EU terrorist list – as though the Court was defying the law which itself had just ruled upon.

Links:

http://www.iran-interlink.org/index.php?mod=view&id=1619

The European judgement was rapidly followed by an equally damning US Supreme Court ruling on MKO fundraising. Then the Iraqi government announced its determination to close (actually to reclaim as Iraqi territory) Camp Ashraf, and have the foreign terrorist MKO expelled from the country.

Links:

http://www.iran-interlink.org/index.php?mod=view&id=1498

At the end of April 2007, the US State Department published its review of terrorist entities. The report marks the MKO out as a dangerous cult with operatives, trained by the former Iraqi regime in bomb making and weapons use, still at-large.

Link:

http://www.iran-interlink.org/index.php?mod=view&id=2309

Now, the final nail in the MKO’s political coffin has surely been the election of Nicolas Sarkozy as France’s President. France is home to the MKO’s western HQ and residence of co-leader Maryam Rajavi. As Interior Minister in 2003, Sarkozy gave the go-ahead to Judge Brugiere to raid the MKO headquarters in Auvers-sur-Oise during which 160 members were arrested and evidence of planning and financing terrorist activity uncovered. Evidence which is referenced by the State Department report.

Link:

http://www.iran-interlink.org/index.php?mod=view&id=2092

Identified as both a terrorist organisation and as a cult, how are the Rajavis responding to this series of devastating setbacks? Can the group stage a comeback?

The MKO has already closed some websites, stopped live discussion on their TV and refuse to give any reaction to the US report. However, if we take the MKO’s reaction to the EU Court ruling as typical, it is certain we have not heard the last from them. We also know from the reaction to Maryam Rajavi’s arrest in 2003 when she ordered self-immolations to force the French judiciary to release her on bail, that this group will not go quietly.

Significantly, the MKO’s own analysis places blame for the group’s difficulties on its critics. Of these critics, the most troublesome have been ex-members of the organisation who have been outspoken in their exposure of the organisation’s cult activity and its close ties with the Saddam Hussein regime. With ex-members constantly giving the lie to the Mojahedin’s seductive claims to democracy, feminism and popular regime change, it is not surprising that the MKO leaders see these people as the biggest obstacle to their ambitions.

Massoud Rajavi’s plan fourteen years ago was for his wife – whom he nominated president elect – to carry this seductive message to western politicians and media and for her to find western sponsors to allow him to continue the quest he began under the patronage of Saddam Hussein – to somehow engineer the violent overthrow the Iranian regime and to install the Rajavi regime in its place.

It would be easy to assume from this that Rajavi’s efforts to keep Camp Ashraf intact is based on its military capacity. However, with the continuation of the FTO label, if Rajavi agreed to the removal of the Camp and its members, this would allow him to forge ahead with the claim that the MKO has renounced violence. But the Camp has much greater significance to the Rajavis as their ideological training ground. The camp provides the conditions of isolation and de facto imprisonment which are necessary to the imposition of cult mind control and psychological coercion on the members. Without these conditions, members would be free to have contact with their families, and to make value judgements using external points of reference which would certainly result in mass exodus from the organisation.

Rajavi will keep his people in Camp Ashraf at any price. He has employed people to lobby the Defence Ministries of European countries on his behalf. In the UK a minor academic, who has a track record of support for the Rajavis, has been tasked to make overtures to the Ministry of Defence in order to create a bridge for senior MKO members to pressure the department (the threat of mass suicide in Camp Ashraf is just one of those ‘pressures’). The only purpose for such contact would be to beg for the preservation of Camp Ashraf or provision of a similar discreet base in a third country, possibly Jordan.

While this is ongoing, the situation in Rajavi’s western bases is hardly less desperate. With Sarkozy’s election, Maryam Rajavi’s trial on terrorism charges will likely go ahead sooner rather than later. The Rajavis will need diversionary tactics such as the self-immolations staged while she was held in custody in 2003.

To mark the anniversary of her arrest on June 17 the MKO is planning to announce that five million French citizens have signed a petition to have the MKO removed from the terror list. However, this will only work if the ex-members are not able to expose these funny numbers. The aim is to keep them quiet for as long as possible to allow the MKO propaganda machine to work unhindered.

Reliable sources have revealed to Iran-Interlink that the Rajavis have already set in motion a new wave of attacks by Mojahedin cult members, particularly in the UK, aimed to intimidate and silence the ex-members and other critics whom they blame for this situation (the Rajavis never believe their own activities to be at fault). The attacks typically begin with distribution of slanderous colour brochures in the places of residence and work followed by indirect harassment and intimidation. The next step is to send members to physically intimidate the target. Criminal damage and physical harm have been reported previously in several cases, including a Catholic priest who was attacked while coming to the aid of one such ex-member.

The information given to Iran-Interlink ties in with previous attempts by the MKO to undermine the ex-members’ efforts. For years the Rajavis have tried to discredit them with the accusation that they are working for the Iranian Intelligence Ministry. Inside the Mojahedin the ‘crime’ of working for the regime carries with it an automatic death penalty. Whenever this accusation is made the Rajavis are giving tacit permission to MKO members to execute the target.

While this kind of low-level intimidation has become standard for this terrorist group (as with many others), the conditions which it faces now should alert western governments to act quickly to prevent any escalation into violence, even death.

The main consideration with the Mojahedin is that it is a cult. When Maryam Rajavi goes to trial the Mojahedin will, without doubt, respond with a series of orchestrated protests including more self-immolations. But, with their backs now against the wall the Rajavis may have no option but to order more forceful expression to avoid submitting to the course of justice. As a destructive cult, there is no doubt that the MKO will resort to violence in response to outer threat. The MKO will follow the predicted path of all cults and kill its own members as well as killing external threats. This may begin with self-immolations and targeted assassination of its critics. It may even affect a wider circle, including members of the public. Whatever violence ensues, the perpetrators of these acts will be as much the victims of the Rajavis as the targets are.

Iran-Interlink,

PO Box 148

Leeds LS16 5YJ

+44 113 278 0503

http://www.iran-interlink.org

info@iran-interlink.org

Iran Interlink Brief – Iran Interlink, May 2007

May 14, 2007 0 comments

Mujahedin Khalq 's Function

MKO Supporter, Agent of Saddam Secret Service

Buratha news website published a top secret document from former regime’s secret service, revealing the ties between a supporter of MKO and Saddam’s security services.

This document exposed the relationship between MKO supporter Saleh Al-Mutlaq and Saddam’s secret services.

"After the fall of Saddam, he tried to distant himself from these relations but the documents show the reality," Buratha said.

The document, No. 3501, dated May 2002 and signed by former Iraqi "Mokhaberat" (secret service), reveals that Saleh Al-Multaq worked for that secret service since 1999.

The documented (translated from Arabic) is as follows:

In the name of God, the most compassionate, the most merciful

Top Secret

Iraqi Republic

President

Intelligence Service

No 3501

May 26, 2002

"Keep people’s secrets and don’t pass it to others and don’t use it against friends", President, Commander Saddam Hussein

Subj.: source (Saleh Mahmoud al-Mutlaq)

We contacted this source in 1999 through one of our sources abroad. After hearing all his conditions and needs, we gave him what turned him into a valuable source ready to perform his duties. This was done by General Salman Mohammed al-Jaboori.

To view the original document, see the link:

http://www.burathanews.com/news_article_19856.html

Buratha News, May 13, 2007 – translated by Iran Didban

May 14, 2007 0 comments

Newer Posts

Older Posts